I am doing the Luzon provincial borders, using border images from WIKIPEDIA maps.
Take a look at how im doing it. I need some guidance.
Should I do polygons or traces?
Heres what I did.
First see the screen shot of the USA map in City Navigator.
It’s a heavy Gray line for states. States would be the same as Provinces. So I can see that Jan would probably want to do the same.
Secondly Provinces have town borders that host barangays. We would call them counties.
My question is to you all.
Should my efforts attatched be.
Province borders only via trace
Province borders only via polygon
Town borders also via trace
Town borders also via polygon?
Im thinking the Province borders should be traces converted to gray like states in city Navigator.
I also think it may be helpful to add the Town borders and have them end up as thin dotted or dashed lines.
Please advise.
Ill not go anyfurther till I get some consensus on this.
Attatchments.
*Screen shot of my USA map in Mapsource
*KMZ showing an image overlay with 70% opacity and some batangas borders as tracings.
Take a look at how im doing it. I need some guidance.
Should I do polygons or traces?
Heres what I did.
First see the screen shot of the USA map in City Navigator.
It’s a heavy Gray line for states. States would be the same as Provinces. So I can see that Jan would probably want to do the same.
Secondly Provinces have town borders that host barangays. We would call them counties.
My question is to you all.
Should my efforts attatched be.
Province borders only via trace
Province borders only via polygon
Town borders also via trace
Town borders also via polygon?
Im thinking the Province borders should be traces converted to gray like states in city Navigator.
I also think it may be helpful to add the Town borders and have them end up as thin dotted or dashed lines.
Please advise.
Ill not go anyfurther till I get some consensus on this.
Attatchments.
*Screen shot of my USA map in Mapsource
*KMZ showing an image overlay with 70% opacity and some batangas borders as tracings.
Comment